Skip to content

STEP File Format Support Matrix (Part 21 vs Part 28)

This document outlines the support status for STEP Part 21 (ASCII) and Part 28 (XML) across major CAD software.

For CAE pipelines (including Ansys Workbench/SpaceClaim/Fluent workflows), Part 21 remains the practical default unless the receiver explicitly confirms Part 28 support.


📊 CAD Software Support Status

Major CAD Software

CAD SoftwarePart 21 (.stp, .step)Part 28 (.stpx, .stpZ)Remarks
SolidWorks✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only. AP203/214/242 support.
CATIA V5/V6✅ Full Support⚠️ LimitedPart 21 is primary. AP214/242 support. No explicit Part 28 support.
Siemens NX✅ Full Support✅ SupportedSupports reading/writing .stpx and .stpZ (compressed).
PTC Creo✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only. AP203/214/242 support.
Autodesk Inventor✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only.
Fusion 360✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only.
FreeCAD✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedBased on OpenCascade; Part 21 only.
Rhino✅ Full Support❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only.

Specialized Tools & Converters

ToolPart 21Part 28Remarks
Kubotek Kosmos✅ Supported✅ SupportedPart 28 support started in Aug 2025 (v7.1).
CAD Exchanger✅ Supported⚠️ LimitedPart 21 is primary.
STEP Tools✅ Supported✅ SupportedCommercial tool; full support for both formats.
OpenCascade✅ Supported❌ Not SupportedPart 21 only (Open Source).

📈 Current Status of Part 28 (STEP-XML)

Standards & History

  • First Published: 2007 (ISO 10303-28:2007)
  • Latest Version: ISO 10303-28:2016
  • Official Name: "ISO 10303-28: Industrial automation systems and integration — Product data representation and exchange — Part 28: Implementation methods: XML representations of EXPRESS schemas and data, using XML schemas"

Characteristics

Pros:

  • Compatibility with XML technologies (XSLT transformation, XPath search, etc.).
  • Support for assembly-level PMI.
  • Support for UUID (Unique Universal ID).
  • Integration with Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) processes.

Cons:

  • Large file sizes (2-3 times larger than Part 21).
  • Slow adoption by CAD software vendors.
  • Less prevalent compared to Part 21.

Prevalence (as of 2025)

Part 21 (ASCII):  ████████████████████ 99%+
Part 28 (XML):    ██                    Less than 5%

Common Use Cases:

  • 🟢 Part 21: CAD data exchange (most common).
  • 🟡 Part 28:
    • Long-Term Archiving (LOTAR)
    • MBE process integration
    • Emerging AI/LLM applications
    • Academic and research purposes

🎯 Recommendations for Implementers

Choosing a File Format

When to use Part 21 (.step):

  • ✅ For general CAD-to-CAD data exchange.
  • ✅ When maximum compatibility is required.
  • ✅ To keep file sizes manageable.
  • ✅ When human-readability in a text editor is desired.

When to consider Part 28 (.stpx):

  • ⚠️ When you want to leverage XML processing tools.
  • ⚠️ For long-term archiving purposes (LOTAR compliance).
  • ⚠️ For integration with MBE processes.
  • ⚠️ When the receiver explicitly specifies Part 28 support.

WARNING

Compatibility Warning

Before sending a Part 28 file, always confirm that the receiver's CAD software supports it. If not, the file may fail to open.

Parser Implementation Priority

If you are building a custom STEP parser:

  1. Phase 1: Support Part 21 (Mandatory)

    • Covers 99% of files.
    • Relatively simple to implement.
  2. Phase 2: Support Part 28 (Optional)

    • Leverage existing XML parsing libraries.
    • Demand is currently limited.

🔍 How to Check Part 28 Support

In CAD Software

Check if .stpx appears in the file selection dialog:

File → Import → STEP

Via Command Line

NX (Siemens):

bash
# NX supports Part 28
ugopen -import file.stpx

SolidWorks:

# SolidWorks does not support Part 28; .stpx files will not open.
# Conversion to Part 21 (.step) is required.

📚 Technical Background: Part 21 vs Part 28

Visual Comparison of Encoding

Differences in File Structure

Part 21 (ASCII):

step
ISO-10303-21;
HEADER;
  FILE_DESCRIPTION(('Example'),'2;1');
  FILE_NAME(...);
  FILE_SCHEMA(('AP242...'));
ENDSEC;
DATA;
  #10=PRODUCT('Part_A',...);
  #20=PRODUCT_DEFINITION(...);
ENDSEC;
END-ISO-10303-21;

Part 28 (XML):

xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<iso_10303_28 xmlns="urn:oid:1.0.10303.28.2.1.1"
              version="1">
  <exp:iso_10303 xmlns:exp="..." schema="AP242">
    <product id="id1" name="Part_A">
      ...
    </product>
  </exp:iso_10303>
</iso_10303_28>

File Size Comparison (Examples)

FilePart 21Part 28Ratio
Simple Cube5 KB15 KB~3x
Mid-size Assembly2 MB6 MB~3x
Large Product50 MB150 MB~3x

Official Standards

  • ISO 10303-21: Clear text encoding (Part 21)
  • ISO 10303-28: XML representations (Part 28)
  • Available for purchase from ISO or national standards bodies.

Implementation Guides


❓ FAQ

Q: Why isn't Part 28 more common given it's newer?

A: Main reasons include:

  1. Part 21 is Sufficient: Most CAD exchange needs are met perfectly well by Part 21.
  2. File Size: XML is redundant, leading to much larger files.
  3. Slow CAD Adoption: Major CAD vendors haven't prioritized Part 28 support.
  4. Backward Compatibility: Part 21 has better compatibility with older systems.

Q: Will Part 28 become the mainstream in the future?

A: In the short term (next ~5 years), Part 21 will remain the dominant format.

In the long term: Adoption of Part 28 may increase as MBE and AI applications grow, but it is unlikely to completely replace Part 21.

Q: Can I convert between Part 21 and Part 28?

A: Yes, it is possible.

  • Part 21 → Part 28: Relatively easy since the underlying data structure is the same.
  • Part 28 → Part 21: Possible (XML to ASCII conversion).

Conversion Tools:

  • STEP Tools (Commercial)
  • Kubotek Kosmos (Commercial)
  • Custom scripts (based on EXPRESS schemas)

📝 Summary

Advice for Implementers:

  1. Prioritize Part 21 Support First

    • Covers 99% of use cases.
    • Supported by all major CAD systems.
  2. Use Part 28 for Specific Needs Only

    • Long-term archiving.
    • MBE integration.
    • Only when the receiver explicitly supports it.
  3. When in Doubt, Use Part 21

    • Superior in terms of compatibility, file size, and available tooling.

Last Updated: 2025-12-19
Sources: Official CAD vendor documentation, CAx-IF, Web research.


📚 Next Steps

Back to README

Released under the CC-BY-4.0 License.